Theft and white-collar crimes in Texas can range from shoplifting and theft by check to insurance fraud and money laundering. These cases often involve complicated fact patterns and result in serious criminal charges brought against business executives and professionals. If you face these types of charges, your future is at stake. You need an attorney immediately who can start working to minimize damage to your career and reputation.
With more than 30 years of criminal experience and 300 trials between us, Messina Madson and Kendall Castello know how to analyze and attack these kinds of criminal prosecutions. We know the issues involved as well as many of the prosecutors and judges.
As First Assistant and Administrative Chief for the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office, Messina and Kendall helped build and implement the nation’s largest DA-led diversion program, which offers expunction or non-disclosure to many offenders who complete state rehabilitation requirements. We know the options available to deal with an allegation and keep it off our clients’ records.
Madson Castello, PLLC, is committed to providing extensive, personalized attention. Unlike law firms that depend upon high volumes of cases, we choose to work with few clients for exceptional results. We use our extensive experience as both prosecutors and criminal defense attorneys to zealously fight for our clients. If that sounds like what you are looking for, we are an ideal firm.
The levels of offense assigned to theft and white-collar crimes are most often guided by the amount of the loss. So, the punishment range for theft crimes, fraud crimes, computer crimes, telecommunication crimes, money laundering, insurance fraud, and healthcare fraud are often similar based on the amount of loss. For this reason, we have grouped those items together generally under the term theft below. Robbery and burglary (of a habitation or building) are exceptions to this rule and are punished based on the characteristics of the offense and not the amount of loss.
Theft under $100
Theft $100 to $750
Burglary of a Coin Operated Machine
Burglary of a Vehicle
Theft $750 to $2,500
Burglary of a Building
Theft $2,500 to $30,000
Theft Enhanced by Two Previous Misdemeanor Thefts
Unauthorized Use of a Motor Vehicle
Theft $30,000 to $150,000
Theft of Trade Secret
Burglary of a Habitation
Theft $150,000 to $300,000
Burglary of a Habitation with Intent to Commit a Felony
Theft $300,000 or more
When you are accused of a criminal offense, nothing speaks louder than the results an attorney earns. Here are a few examples of results we have received in recent cases:
Forgery of a Financial Instrument—Client was a female business owner accused of stealing from banks by forgery. We were able to demonstrate client’s substantial efforts toward rehabilitation and provide restitution for losses. Case resulted in dismissal.
Felony Theft Enhanced—Female client accused of a series of retail thefts by fraud. We demonstrated the cases were not what they appeared and involved employee misconduct. Case was dismissed.
Felony Theft by Check Enhanced—Client was a salesman whose ex-wife had emptied his account without his knowledge. He wrote multiple checks that bounced and this case ensued. Client had a record from many years before that made negotiations more difficult. Case was eventually dismissed with restitution.
Fraudulent Tampering with a Government Record—Client accused of selling car with fake title. We were able to demonstrate that client believed that the title was valid and his employers were the ones committing fraud. Case dismissed.
Unlawful Political Contribution—Client was a high-level executive at a major local company. Client was under investigation for an unlawful political contribution. Issue centered around whether a contribution to a political committee constituted a political contribution if the funds could be shown to have eventually landed in a specific political campaign. We were able to demonstrate that the funds could not be accurately tracked and that a contribution to a political committee could not be treated as a contribution to a specific political campaign. Case was eventually released without indictment or presentation to a grand jury.
Unlawful Use of Motor Vehicle—Client was a critical employee for an organization that trains elite fighting forces for the United States military. Prior to our involvement, client pled guilty to the felony offense of unlawful use of a motor vehicle. A felony conviction would not allow the client to continue to train military personnel because of the firearms that are used. We worked directly with the district attorney and district judge in that county to overturn the conviction with a motion for new trial. We eventually pled the case to a misdemeanor reduction, so the client could continue to do his critical training work.